View Single Post
  #3  
Old 07-03-2009, 10:24 PM
Pmb Pmb is offline
PHF Helper
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Boston's North Shore
Posts: 296
Thanks: 10
Thanked 140 Times in 98 Posts
Pmb has a spectacular aura aboutPmb has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sKiD View Post
In my research for a school project, I've stumbled across a modified twin paradox here.

It apparently seems to violate special relativity, yet I cannot find any faults in the argument with my current knowledge (admittedly not a lot, but I've read about the original twin paradox).

I have searched the internet for an answer, but there seems to be nothing written about this. As it is the holidays, I am unable to ask my teachers. So can someone provide an explanation or refutation (for my interest)?

Any help would be appreciated.
The assumption [i]At the time each twin passes the beacon, at a high relative velocity, each will believe that his counterpart should be younger.[/quote] is false. This is not what is predicted by special relativity. The twin paradox is based on an asymmetry in the observers motion. In that example there is no asymmetry present.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pmb For This Useful Post:
sKiD (07-06-2009)

Donate to PHF