| 
11-01-2009, 11:01 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 49
Thanks: 3
Thanked 15 Times in 14 Posts
| | Creat A new Law in physics I always think if I can create a new law that will help the universe --
If I told you to come up with a law in Physics or Math, What would you think of ? | 
11-01-2009, 04:32 PM
|  | Super Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Argentina
Posts: 676
Thanks: 244
Thanked 241 Times in 171 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by Aladdin I always think if I can create a new law that will help the universe --
If I told you to come up with a law in Physics or Math, What would you think of ? | A theory that would be able to predict results no previous theory does.
__________________ Isaac If the problem is too hard just let the Universe solve it. | 
11-02-2009, 02:01 AM
| | PHF Helper | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 221
Thanked 444 Times in 398 Posts
| | I always thought that laws are discovered, not created! | 
11-02-2009, 10:51 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: india
Posts: 399
Thanks: 86
Thanked 154 Times in 138 Posts
| | may i add something ?
i learnt this from a nobel laureate in person that in order to revolutionize the existing physics, we should always try our best to reformulate the same problem in many different ways. as an example, he told me how quantum mechanics was reformulated in many different ways(most of which i did not understand ,though)led to ground breaking research and laid foundations to some very modern theories.he said mainly about some matrix notations (may be something else) and path integrals in this regard. | | The Following User Says Thank You to r.samanta For This Useful Post: |  | 
11-02-2009, 01:50 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | my new theory 1. though we live in a 3-dimensional universe, but we can only see the two dimensional part of it at any point in time.
i have got lots of explanations and implications.all am working on nw is the mathematics involved | 
11-02-2009, 09:19 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: india
Posts: 399
Thanks: 86
Thanked 154 Times in 138 Posts
| | i think this is a good step. nowadays scientists seldom restrict themselves to 3D, they always deal with infinite dimensions. its better to solve complicacies of 2D, 3D and then move to infinite dimensions. (though, i may be seriously wrong) | 
11-02-2009, 09:43 PM
| | PHF Helper | | Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,274
Thanks: 221
Thanked 444 Times in 398 Posts
| | but we can only see the two dimensional part of it at any point in time.
I dont understand this bit. We can sense the length, breadth and depth of a pit at once for example. Because we have two eyes it makes this easier. | 
11-22-2009, 09:29 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| | Quote:
Originally Posted by physicsquest but we can only see the two dimensional part of it at any point in time.
I dont understand this bit. We can sense the length, breadth and depth of a pit at once for example. Because we have two eyes it makes this easier. | Yeah, I have to agree. Having twos eyes placed at the front of our heads gives us this ability. If we were to, let's say, cover or lose an eye, in new environments you would have problems with depth perception. | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:07 AM. | | |
 | |  |